« Thou shalt not bear false witness, for it is the law. | Main | At bloody last. »
United Kingdom: The Daily Telegraph has inadvertantly demonstrated one of the few good points about the proposed law on incitrement to religious hatred, by printing exactly the sort of inflammatory article which would send the editor to jail.
Extremist religious groups that advocate child abuse will be given protection under a Bill published by the Government yesterday...The article then notes the protection which would be given to extreme fundies who beat 'demons' out of children, and then observes, suddenly, with no added context:
Satanists, pagans and atheists would be protected.
Having good reason for making insulting comments that could provoke hatred of a particular religious doctrine would be no defence, nor would the fact that they were true.
The paper then quotes an interesting point made by shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve:
Dominic Grieve, the shadow attorney general, said:We are likely to see religious groups trying to get other religious groups prosecuted, which will inflame community tensions rather than make them better.
He said members of groups such as the British National Party could set up religious sects to articulate white supremacist theologies, then demand the prosecution of those expressing outrage at their views.
Such theologies are seen among white supremacists in the US and, unless we want the government deciding what is, or is not, a religion presumably deserve the same level or respect as other belief systems such as Christianity, Islam or belief in the Tooth Fairy.
Now you face jail for being nasty to Satanists - Daily Telegraph, 10th June 2005.
Posted in
Church and State
at 17:32. Last modified on September 28 2006 at 23:43.
Permalink to this entry | View blog reactions